I have a custom localisation function in my project that enforces the inclusion of the bundle parameter (specifically so that Swift packages are forced to include the Bundle.module value). While migrating to String Catalogs, I noticed that my custom localisation function wasn't being recognised by the automatic extraction that the Swift compiler is doing, but only in my Swift package targets. Is there a way to set something like LOCALIZED_STRING_MACRO_NAMES in Swift Packages?

This is the error I am continuosly receiving.

@discardableResult func doSomething() -> Bool { // does something return true } This function can be called in the following ways: doSomething() let didSucceed = doSomething() Is there a way to differentiate the two from inside the doSomething() function, as in, is there a way to know if the caller is using the result?

I want to build a Swift library package that uses modified build of OpenSSL and Curl. I have already statically compiled both and verified I can use them in an Objective-C framework on my target platform (iOS & iOS Simulator). I'm using XCFramework files that contain the static library binaries and headers: openssl.xcframework/ ios-arm64/ openssl.framework/ Headers/ [...] openssl ios-arm64_x86_64-simulator/ openssl.framework/ Headers/ [...] openssl Info.plist I'm not sure how I'm supposed to set up my Swift package to import these libraries. I can use .systemLibrary but that seems to use the embedded copies of libssl and libcurl on my system, and I can't figure out how to use the path: parameter to that. I also tried using a .binaryTarget pointing to the XCFramework files, but that didn't seem to work as there is no module generated and I'm not sure how to make one myself. At a basic high level, this is what I'm trying to accomplish: where libcrypto & libssl come from the provided openssl.xcframework file, and libcurl from curl.xcframework

HI, I have a app with Swift Programming language. It is built successfully on my Monterey Intel by using Xcode 14. I am trying to built same app on Sonoma Silicon arm64 by using Xcode 15.4. But app is failing to build with below errors. Can anyone suggest reason for this? Copy /Users/testuser/git/agent/out/Darwin/Release/TESTFileProvider.appex/Contents/Resources/swift-nio__NIOFileSystem.bundle /Users/testuser/git/agent/out/Darwin/Release/swift-nio__NIOFileSystem.bundle (in target 'TESTFileProvider' from project 'TEST') cd /Users/testuser/git/agent/dgagent/agent/macosx/dgc/TEST builtin-copy -exclude .DS_Store -exclude CVS -exclude .svn -exclude .git -exclude .hg -resolve-src-symlinks /Users/testuser/git/agent/out/Darwin/Release/swift-nio__NIOFileSystem.bundle /Users/testuser/git/agent/out/Darwin/Release/TESTFileProvider.appex/Contents/Resources error: /Users/testuser/git/agent/out/Darwin/Release/swift-nio__NIOFileSystem.bundle: No such file or directory (in target 'TESTFileProvider' from project 'TEST') Copy /Users/testuser/git/agent/out/Darwin/Release/TESTFileProvider.appex/Contents/Resources/swift-nio_NIOPosix.bundle /Users/testuser/git/agent/out/Darwin/Release/swift-nio_NIOPosix.bundle (in target 'TESTFileProvider' from project 'TEST') cd /Users/testuser/git/agent/dgagent/agent/macosx/dgc/TEST builtin-copy -exclude .DS_Store -exclude CVS -exclude .svn -exclude .git -exclude .hg -resolve-src-symlinks /Users/testuser/git/agent/out/Darwin/Release/swift-nio_NIOPosix.bundle /Users/testuser/git/agent/out/Darwin/Release/TESTFileProvider.appex/Contents/Resources error: /Users/testuser/git/agent/out/Darwin/Release/swift-nio_NIOPosix.bundle: No such file or directory (in target 'TESTFileProvider' from project 'TEST')

I'm continuing with the migration towards Swift 6. Within one of our libraries, I want to check whether a parameter object: Any? confirms to Sendable. I tried the most obvious one: if let sendable = object as? Sendable { } But that results into the compiler error "Marker protocol 'Sendable' cannot be used in a conditional cast". Is there an other way to do this?

Hey, im new here. And I need to share a variable between files, settings and home. I've searched all over and found solutions, but I just don't understand what to do.

Hello there, we have the following crash in production (99% in background) with our latest release, but we are not able to indentify 100% the main actor. It could be Intercom SDK. Firebase reports: Crash CoreFoundation __CFRunLoopServiceMachPort mach_msg __CFRunLoopServiceMachPort Any suggestion?

I want to ask about NSDecimalNumber. is it any changes for use this function ? i test use number like this. example: a = "1000000.0" var a i make number formatter use NumberFormatter b = NSDecimalNumber(string: a with number formatter).decimalValue i try to print b. the value return 1. Anyone can help ?

Helo all, Currently, I'm working on an iOS app that performs measurement and shows the results to the user in a graph. I use a Savitzky-Golay filter to filter out noise, so that the graph is nice and smooth. However, the code that calculates the Savitzky-Golay coefficients using sparse matrices crashes sometimes, throwing an EXC_BAD_ACCESS. I tried to find out what the problem is by turning on Address Sanitizer and Thread Sanitizer, but, for some reason, the bad access exception isn't thrown when either of these is on. What else could I try to trace back the problem? Thanks in advance, CaS To reproduce the error, run the following: import SwiftUI import Accelerate struct ContentView: View { var body: some View { VStack { Button("Try", action: test) } .padding() } func test() { for windowLength in 3...100 { let coeffs = SavitzkyGolay.coefficients(windowLength: windowLength, polynomialOrder: 2) print(coeffs) } } } class SavitzkyGolay { static func coefficients(windowLength: Int, polynomialOrder: Int, derivativeOrder: Int = 0, delta: Int = 1) -> [Double] { let (halfWindow, remainder) = windowLength.quotientAndRemainder(dividingBy: 2) var pos = Double(halfWindow) if remainder == 0 { pos -= 0.5 } let X = [Double](stride(from: Double(windowLength) - pos - 1, through: -pos, by: -1)) let P = [Double](stride(from: 0, through: Double(polynomialOrder), by: 1)) let A = P.map { exponent in X.map { pow($0, exponent) } } var B = [Double](repeating: 0, count: polynomialOrder + 1) B[derivativeOrder] = Double(factorial(derivativeOrder)) / pow(Double(delta), Double(derivativeOrder)) return leastSquaresSolution(A: A, B: B) } static func leastSquaresSolution(A: [[Double]], B: [Double]) -> [Double] { let sparseA = A.sparseMatrix() var sparseAValuesCopy = sparseA.values var xValues = [Double](repeating: 0, count: A.transpose().count) var bValues = B sparseAValuesCopy.withUnsafeMutableBufferPointer { valuesPtr in let a = SparseMatrix_Double( structure: sparseA.structure, data: valuesPtr.baseAddress! ) bValues.withUnsafeMutableBufferPointer { bPtr in xValues.withUnsafeMutableBufferPointer { xPtr in let b = DenseVector_Double( count: Int32(B.count), data: bPtr.baseAddress! ) let x = DenseVector_Double( count: Int32(A.transpose().count), data: xPtr.baseAddress! ) #warning("EXC_BAD_ACCESS is thrown below") print("This code is executed...") let status = SparseSolve(SparseLSMR(), a, b, x, SparsePreconditionerDiagScaling) print("...but, if an EXC_BAD_ACCESS is thrown, this code isn't") if status != SparseIterativeConverged { fatalError("Failed to converge. Returned with error \(status).") } } } } return xValues } } func factorial(_ n: Int) -> Int { n < 2 ? 1 : n * factorial(n - 1) } extension Array where Element == [Double] { func sparseMatrix() -> (structure: SparseMatrixStructure, values: [Double]) { let columns = self.transpose() var rowIndices: [Int32] = columns.map { column in column.indices.compactMap { indexInColumn in if column[indexInColumn] != 0 { return Int32(indexInColumn) } return nil } }.reduce([], +) let sparseColumns = columns.map { column in column.compactMap { if $0 != 0 { return $0 } return nil } } var counter = 0 var columnStarts = [Int]() for sparseColumn in sparseColumns { columnStarts.append(counter) counter += sparseColumn.count } let reducedSparseColumns = sparseColumns.reduce([], +) columnStarts.append(reducedSparseColumns.count) let structure: SparseMatrixStructure = rowIndices.withUnsafeMutableBufferPointer { rowIndicesPtr in columnStarts.withUnsafeMutableBufferPointer { columnStartsPtr in let attributes = SparseAttributes_t() return SparseMatrixStructure( rowCount: Int32(self.count), columnCount: Int32(columns.count), columnStarts: columnStartsPtr.baseAddress!, rowIndices: rowIndicesPtr.baseAddress!, attributes: attributes, blockSize: 1 ) } } return (structure, reducedSparseColumns) } func transpose() -> Self { let columns = self.count let rows = self.reduce(0) { Swift.max($0, $1.count) } return (0 ..< rows).reduce(into: []) { result, row in result.append((0 ..< columns).reduce(into: []) { result, column in result.append(row < self[column].count ? self[column][row] : 0) }) } } }

Hello! I am working on a project that does some automatic code generation using SwiftSyntax and SwiftSyntaxBuilder. As part of this project, I want to put in a comment at the top of the file warning users to not modify the file and make it obvious that the code was automatically generated. I was trying to use the .lineComment(String) static member of the Trivia (or TriviaPiece) types and I expected that the comment would automatically be prefixed with the expected // and space for use in code. (For example, Trivia.lineComment("No comment") would be written as // No Comment when sent through a BasicFormat Object or similar SyntaxRewriter). I was surprised to find that this is not the case and was wondering before I write an issue on GitHub whether this behavior is intentional or a bug. If it is intentional, I'm not entirely sure if I'm missing something regarding this to more easily generate these comments. At the moment my comment generation consists of constructing the comment in the leadingTrivia of the syntax node that appears after the comment. For example: VariableDeclSyntax(leadingTrivia: [.newlines(2), .lineComment("// These members are always generated irrespective of the contents of the generated files. They are intended to exclusively centralize code symbols that would otherwise be repeated frequently."), .newlines(1)], modifiers: [DeclModifierSyntax(name: .keyword(.private)), DeclModifierSyntax(name: .keyword(.static))], .let, name: PatternSyntax(IdentifierPatternSyntax(identifier: "decoder")), initializer: InitializerClauseSyntax(value: ExprSyntax(stringLiteral: "\(configuration.decoderExpression)"))) outputs // These members are always generated irrespective of the contents of the generated files. They are intended to exclusively centralize code symbols that would otherwise be repeated frequently. private static let decoder = JSONDecoder() in this project (with example data having been added).

I'm working on Swift 6 concurrency support for our app. I've always thought of NSAccessibilityElement as being like all of the other UI classes- only used (or usable) on the main thread. As far as I've seen, they are always called on the main thread. But in Xcode 16 beta 2, it's only marked as Sendable but not MainActor. Is that just an oversight or do we need to worry about these being used / called on threads? It's easy enough to do the async work (well, not that easy), but I don't want to do all that work if Xcode 16 beta 3 is just going to add a MainActor to it. I've already been burned by that once, in WebKit- the first beta was missing several MainActor declarations, in places where it was unclear from the documentation. I added a bunch of async fixes to my delegates, only to have to take it all out when the second Xcode beta shipped and the SDK headers changed. How complete are the async declarations in the Xcode 16 SDKs?

Hello, I want to use Automatic Grammar Agreement to localise a string in my app, let say "three remaining activities". The string "three" is obtained by using a NumberFormatter with a numberStyle set to .spellOut (so I'm not using an Integer) var formatter: NumberFormatter = NumberFormatter() formatter.numberStyle = .spellOut let formattedCount: String = numberFormatter.string(from: count as NSNumber)! Text("key_with_string_\(formattedCount)") In my string catalog, I have translated the key key_with_string_%@ like this ^[%@ remaining activity](inflect: true), but it does not work. I've tried to add the integer value used by the number formatter in the key key_with_string_%@_%lld but it does not work. Should Automatic Grammar Agreement work normally just by using the formatted string provided by the NumberFormatter? If not, is there a way to specify to use a secondary variable (my count integer) to switch between different categories like one and other automatically? Thanks ! Axel

Hello everyone, I'm encountering an issue with Swift and C++ interoperability when passing a void pointer between Swift and C++ functions. When I pass pMessageBuffer (an UnsafeMutableRawPointer) from Swift to MyCppClass.NFCompletion (a static c++ function), which expects a reference to void pointer, Swift throws an error "Cannot convert value of type 'UnsafeMutableRawPointer' to expected argument type 'Optional' ". Here is a sample code to help in better visualization of the usecase. Cpp Code class MyCppClass { public: static void SendData(void *pMessage, TUInt16 pMessageLength) { // Assume vSocket is my Swift object held in C++. vSocket.Send(pMessage, pMessageLength); } static void NFCompletion(void * & pBuffer, TInt64 pErrorCode, VPtr pCompletionFunction) { // Process the buffer. } }; Swift Code: public class MySwiftClass { var vConnection: NWConnection? public init() {} public func Send(_ pMessageBuffer: UnsafeMutableRawPointer, _ pMessageLength: TSUInt16) { let messageData = Data(bytesNoCopy: pMessageBuffer, count: Int(pMessageLength), deallocator: .none) self.vConnection?.send(content: messageData, completion: .contentProcessed { nw_error in var error_code: TSInt64 = 0 if let nw_error = nw_error { error_code = self.InternalGetNetworkErrorCode(nw_error) } // Here's where the issue arises: MyCppClass.NFCompletion(pMessageBuffer, TInt64(error_code), self.uCompletionHandler) }) } // Example function to handle network errors private func InternalGetNetworkErrorCode(_ error: Error) -> TSInt64 { // Implementation to convert nw_error to TSInt64 error code return 0 // Placeholder return value } } Could someone please help me understand why this conversion error occurs? How should I correctly handle passing a void pointer between Swift and C++ functions, ensuring compatibility and proper memory management? Note: TSInt64 is typealias for swift Int and TInt64 is alias of c++ int_64t. Thank you in advance for your assistance! Regards, Harshal

I have a Matrix structure as defined below for working with 2D numerical data in Accelerate. The underlying numerical data in this Matrix struct is stored as an Array. struct Matrix<T> { let rows: Int let columns: Int var data: [T] init(rows: Int, columns: Int, fill: T) { self.rows = rows self.columns = columns self.data = Array(repeating: fill, count: rows * columns) } init(rows: Int, columns: Int, source: (inout UnsafeMutableBufferPointer<T>) -> Void) { self.rows = rows self.columns = columns self.data = Array(unsafeUninitializedCapacity: rows * columns) { buffer, initializedCount in source(&buffer) initializedCount = rows * columns } } subscript(row: Int, column: Int) -> T { get { return self.data[(row * self.columns) + column] } set { self.data[(row * self.columns) + column] = newValue } } } Multiplication is implemented by the functions shown below. import Accelerate infix operator .* func .* (lhs: Matrix<Double>, rhs: Matrix<Double>) -> Matrix<Double> { precondition(lhs.rows == rhs.rows && lhs.columns == rhs.columns, "Matrices must have same dimensions") let result = Matrix<Double>(rows: lhs.rows, columns: rhs.columns) { buffer in vDSP.multiply(lhs.data, rhs.data, result: &buffer) } return result } func * (lhs: Matrix<Double>, rhs: Matrix<Double>) -> Matrix<Double> { precondition(lhs.columns == rhs.rows, "Number of columns in left matrix must equal number of rows in right matrix") var a = lhs.data var b = rhs.data let m = lhs.rows // number of rows in matrices A and C let n = rhs.columns // number of columns in matrices B and C let k = lhs.columns // number of columns in matrix A; number of rows in matrix B let alpha = 1.0 let beta = 0.0 // matrix multiplication where C ← αAB + βC let c = Matrix<Double>(rows: lhs.rows, columns: rhs.columns) { buffer in cblas_dgemm(CblasRowMajor, CblasNoTrans, CblasNoTrans, m, n, k, alpha, &a, k, &b, n, beta, buffer.baseAddress, n) } return c } I can also define a Matrix structure where the underlying data is an UnsafeMutableBufferPointer. The buffer is handled by the MatrixData class. struct Matrix<T> { let rows: Int let columns: Int var data: MatrixData<T> init(rows: Int, columns: Int, fill: T) { self.rows = rows self.columns = columns self.data = MatrixData(count: rows * columns, fill: fill) } init(rows: Int, columns: Int) { self.rows = rows self.columns = columns self.data = MatrixData(count: rows * columns) } subscript(row: Int, column: Int) -> T { get { return self.data.buffer[(row * self.columns) + column] } set { self.data.buffer[(row * self.columns) + column] = newValue } } } class MatrixData<T> { var buffer: UnsafeMutableBufferPointer<T> var baseAddress: UnsafeMutablePointer<T> { get { self.buffer.baseAddress! } } init(count: Int, fill: T) { let start = UnsafeMutablePointer<T>.allocate(capacity: count) self.buffer = UnsafeMutableBufferPointer(start: start, count: count) self.buffer.initialize(repeating: fill) } init(count: Int) { let start = UnsafeMutablePointer<T>.allocate(capacity: count) self.buffer = UnsafeMutableBufferPointer(start: start, count: count) } deinit { self.buffer.deinitialize() self.buffer.deallocate() } } Multiplication for this approach is implemented by the functions shown here. import Accelerate infix operator .* func .* (lhs: Matrix<Double>, rhs: Matrix<Double>) -> Matrix<Double> { precondition(lhs.rows == rhs.rows && lhs.columns == rhs.columns, "Matrices must have same dimensions") let result = Matrix<Double>(rows: lhs.rows, columns: lhs.columns) vDSP.multiply(lhs.data.buffer, rhs.data.buffer, result: &result.data.buffer) return result } func * (lhs: Matrix<Double>, rhs: Matrix<Double>) -> Matrix<Double> { precondition(lhs.columns == rhs.rows, "Number of columns in left matrix must equal number of rows in right matrix") let a = lhs.data.baseAddress let b = rhs.data.baseAddress let m = lhs.rows // number of rows in matrices A and C let n = rhs.columns // number of columns in matrices B and C let k = lhs.columns // number of columns in matrix A; number of rows in matrix B let alpha = 1.0 let beta = 0.0 // matrix multiplication where C ← αAB + βC let c = Matrix<Double>(rows: lhs.rows, columns: rhs.columns) cblas_dgemm(CblasRowMajor, CblasNoTrans, CblasNoTrans, m, n, k, alpha, a, k, b, n, beta, c.data.baseAddress, n) return c } Both of these approaches give me similar performance. The only difference that I have noticed is the matrix buffer approach allows for reference semantics. For example, the code below uses half the memory with the matrix buffer approach compared to the matrix array approach. This is because b acts as a reference to a using the matrix buffer approach; otherwise, the matrix array approach makes a full copy of a. let n = 10_000 let a = Matrix<Double>(rows: n, columns: n, fill: 0) var b = a b[0, 0] = 99 b[0, 1] = 22 Other than reference semantics, are there any reasons to use one of these approaches over the other?

Sorry this post is duplicate

Hello All, some background information first. I have the following struct: Struct Category: Identifiable, Codeable, Hashable { var id: UUID var name: String var subCategory: [Category]? } var categories: [Category] There is no limit how many levels deep the subcategory can be. The user is essentially creating a hierarchical data filing system. Given that the number of subCategory levels is unlimited, I am recursing over the subcategories to find the correct level at which to insert the newCategory. The recursive function to add category is declared as: func recursiveAddCategory(newCategory: Category, subCategoryOf: inout [Category]?) you will note that I am trying to pass the subCategory as a reference (using inout), so that I can add to the original and the function is called as recursiveAddCategory(newCategory, &categories.subCategory!) the actual append statement within the recursiveAddCategory function is: categories.subCategory?.append(newCategory) I am encountering no errors but also find that the newCategory is not being added to the categories array. Any help or guidance appreciated. Thanks

I am working thru the issues of turning on Strict Concurrency Checking. I have a SwiftData application, and I am compressing images before saving them as data. My save function is pretty simple private func save() { ImageCompressor.compress(image: (frontImageSelected?.asUIImage())!, maxByte: 1_048_576) { image in guard image != nil else { print("Error compressing image") return } if let greetingCard { greetingCard.cardName = cardName greetingCard.cardFront = image?.pngData() greetingCard.cardManufacturer = cardManufacturer greetingCard.cardURL = cardURL greetingCard.eventType = eventType } else { let newGreetingCard = GreetingCard(cardName: cardName, cardFront: image?.pngData(), eventType: eventType, cardManufacturer: cardManufacturer, cardURL: cardURL) modelContext.insert(newGreetingCard) } } } I compress the selected image, I had to change my ImageCompressor.compress closure to Sendable, but now every assignment above is flagging with the above warning. I define the greetingCard as var greetingCard: GreetingCard? in my view, since I can have it passed in for edit, or generated if new. I also get the same warning on modelContext, which is defined as @Environment(\.modelContext) private var modelContext. It's not clear to me how to address this warning. Any pointers would be helpful.

Hi, When using Swift Concurrency blocking tasks like file I/O, GPU work and networking can prevent forward moving progress and have the potential to exhaust the cooperative thread pool and under utilize the CPU. It's been recommended to offload these tasks from the cooperative thread pool. Is my understanding correct that the preferred way to do this is by creating async tasks via Dispatch or OperationQueue? And combining these with Continuations if a return value from the task is required? Or should I always be using Continuations in combination with Dispatch/OperationQueue? There are also Executors but the documentation seems a bit limited on how to use these. The new TaskExecutor is also only available on the latest beta's. My question is basically what is the recommend way to offload a task? Thanks!

struct Preview: View { private static let NAME = "Test" @Query(filter: #Predicate<Item> { $0.name == Preview.NAME}) private var items: [Item] var body: some View { MyView(name: Preview.NAME, items: items) } } Compile error occurs: key path cannot refer to static member 'NAME' How can a (static) constant be referred in member closure?